Dr. Tim O´Shea.
McMaster University, Toronto. Divisions of General Internal Medicine
and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
CORONAVIRUS – WHY AND HOW IT WILL SOON VANISH OVERNIGHT
those addicted to the everyday Kool-Aid of tabloid media at
Yahoo News, etc. you’re in for a big surprise.
month’s newsletter dealt
with the historical context of our newest Boutique Epidemic.
month we’ll cover why this phantasm is being kept alive, in the
absence of scientific evidence. And why it’s about to vanish.
have to be much of a fortuneteller to see all the usual signs falling
fading of the illness despite desperate attempts to keep it alive.
lack of legitimate testing proving patients actually all have the
recent funding, which always signals the end of any Boutique
Saturday, 29 Feb, President Trump, Mike Pence, Alex Azar, and Toni
Fauci held a press conference, carried live on Fox.  If
you didn’t watch that show, you’re not really interested
first thing we learned is that at present there are only 22 cases of
the “novel” virus in the entire United States. Let that
fact sink in. Out of almost 350 million people.
was the very first time a major news channel acknowledged that
coronavirus wasn’t a very serious disease, because the majority
of cases recovered completely in a couple of weeks. Just like the
flu. And the cured should then be deducted from the statistics. No
one else does that.
every other story in all media for the past three months simply piles
the cases up, week after week, continuing to add to a growing list,
making no allowance for patients that are no longer sick. Which
is 99.9% of
has been a brand new trick with this particular Boutique Epidemic
A tipoff to the underlying agenda. Result: it looks as though numbers
are increasing out of control and it’s a growing global
deliberately misleading tactic explains why reported numbers for
coronavirus are all over the map, depending on the source.
whole tone of that Saturday’s Fox press conference was in stark
contrast to everyday news reports on coronavirus, since it all began.
Did you notice that? It was night and day.
once here were some very informed people – heads of HHS, NIH,
the President – all saying the same thing – that
Americans should go back to work and not worry about it, that the
risk in this country was minimal, if that.
do you even know of one person with coronavirus?
mood was the polar opposite of all other media stories. Across the
board the four speakers were very measured, calm, and consistent with
the facts.  They
all agreed that even though there may be more cases appearing, for
the most part it’s not a serious threat to public health.
Mainly because it’s no more serious a disease than the flu,
except in the cases of the debilitated.
more serious than the flu? How about this: What if all these new
cases really are nothing
but the flu?
Just the normal seasonal flu. Why not? There’s really no solid
evidence to support otherwise.
technique of re-categorization is nothing new. It was used
successfully in most of the recent Boutique Epidemics, reported in
the February newsletter. 
no, you say this is a brand new virus, a “novel” virus.
Really? Prove it.
and its 500 mostly harmless strains have been known for decades. The
identification process for “new” COVID (or
2019-nCoV)virus or the newest SARS COVID19 virus – has been
ludicrously inconsistent from the very beginning. At every level –
federal, state, local.
the first month, the viral strain was not even identified. So anybody
who got sick with anything was likely to be included, with no testing
at all. By symptoms only. That was to create a news story. There was
the preconceived agenda.
in January, when they finally decided to say it was a new strain that
was infecting everybody, that’s when they named it 2019-nCoV,
in which n stands
for novel, lest anyone forget we’re claiming this is a brand
then politics took over and somebody decided they didn’t like
that name. So voila – COVID.
Politics eclipses science.
SCIENCE OF TESTING
for the bad news. What is the test they claim to use to identify this
new bug in a patient? The test is called PCR.
This is the classic polymerase
chain reaction test,
invented in the 80s by Dr
In 40 years doctors have never come up with any test more accurate
than this very flawed, theoretical estimate of microbial activity.
test produces loads of false positives, often failing to measure
anything at all.
one is more critical of the test’s reliability than the
Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel prize for inventing PCR to detect HIV,
 explains its limitations—why the PCR is not especially
diagnostic, for HIV or for anything else:
PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances
qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating
numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the
viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood,
these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can
only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be
unique to HIV.
“The tests can detect genetic
sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.” 
identify viruses? Then how do we know all these people have the same
disease, let alone the same novel disease?
means that with all these people who have supposedly been PCR tested
for COVID, there is still no conclusive diagnostic evidence that they
have any coronaviruses at all. Let alone the same virus. According to
the inventor of the primary diagnostic test.
testimony about the limits of PCR actually helped acquit OJ. Though
Johnny didn’t seem to need much help there, did he?)
OF POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION TEST
is not a test that isolates, identifies, or even detects any
particular virus. If you’re sick and have some viral fragments,
the PCR test just amplifies those fragmented sequences millions of
times, from the sample.
the more scientifically minded, here’s a source that’s a
review of the literature on the weakness and unreliability of the
polymerase chain reaction: [ Regulatory
Concerns of PCR 
the PCR test remains the standard that is cited by all corporate
media as the means for diagnosing coronavirus all over the world.
little research shows us that any association with viral disease from
PCR is just
a theory at
best – just an estimate. Nothing like an exact science that
says definitively Ebola or HIV virus or coronavirus is present in
this patient. Which is what everyday media and everyday science is
pretending with coronavirus, pounding it into their undiscriminating
readers’ heads, week after week.
wait. The false science gets much worse than that. There’s no
evidence the PCR test is even being used at all!
VIRUSES: THE MAGIC BOX
is a blatantly false assumption, encouraged by pop media and pop
science. For decades, they’ve pretended that doctors have a
magic box that can isolate and photograph viruses, and sequence its
exact RNA – and then print an image of that sequence –
and then do the same for viruses it finds within any sputum or blood
sample sent in for testing. And that it can Print out the exact
genetic sequence of the sample virus, and then lay it down alongside
the sequence of the novel virus, to compare for a match-up. A perfect
match-up then is a positive test.
is purest science fiction. Nothing even close to such a machine
exists in our dimension. Not even close. But the deception and
assumption that it does exist pervades all media and “scientific”
literature. Even though they are forbidden to provide any specifics
on such a testing process. Which is why the details of COVID testing
is such a closely guarded secret, and why no local clinics claim to
be able to perform such a test.
recently, samples must be sent into CDC, who then provides a simple
positive or negative response. No information on the type of testing,
or the printed results comparing the sequences is offered. Even the
medical clinics who send in the sample must blindly trust in the
CDC’s science, without question.
this is the source where all the online scoreboard numbers of
“infected” COVID patients come from. Look at the CDC’s
webpage  and notice the colossal lack of information on the
specifics of testing. Their most closely guarded secret Looks like
something written by L Ron Hubbard.
this is the best science we have in order to substantiate an entire
few days after the Fox Live press conference, corporate media
new cases of
COVID in the Bay area. This was predicted by the Fox Live conference.
But there’s nothing to be worried about – no more serious
than the flu.
corporate news hysteria ramped up yet another notch. Santa Clara
County’s scoreboard on its website amplified the seriousness of
the four cases beyond all reason. A few days later, it was up to 20
just in Santa Clara County. 
how? They don’t say. Nobody knows.
the same time another site – the California Dept. of Health –
was suddenly claiming 60
cases statewide.  That’s 3x as
many cases as in the entire country just a few days earlier. How is
when it hit me. How could one county in California suddenly have 3x
as many cases as the entire United States after just a few days?
answer is: there are simply no
for counting cases. Plus, there was an agenda across the board to
magnify the seriousness of the “epidemic” by making the
most provocative, groundless predictions for the near future.  But
always with the requisite assurance that “Santa Clara County is
doing everything possible to manage and limit the outbreak…”
The standard bureaucrat slogan, from sea to shining sea…
THE HOME STRETCH
what was going on here? Then I remembered. The $8
funding had just come through Congress.  So that means one thing:
every state and federal bureaucrat in the country is now scrambling
for his fair share, before the whole illusion evaporates. As it is
sure to do, pretty soon.
– whether it’s for a vaccine, or just the illusion of
“control” – funding has always been the predictable
death knell for every single Boutique Epidemic. 
usual pattern is that media redoubles its efforts at maximum hysteria
and grim prediction because they know it’s going to vanish very
we’re seeing right now, like this lame turkey from Yahoo news:
“As the coronavirus spreads, one study predicts that even the
best-case scenario is 15 million dead and a $2.4 trillion hit to
global GDP.” 
the next few weeks, get ready for more like this from the
pre-hominids at the corporate tabloids.
explains the new tone of desperation in media, squeezing every last
drop of urgency out of an event before the Golden Goose flies away.
And why more and more masks are appearing on the street and why there
are shortages of bottled water, rice, etc in most Bay Area
supermarkets. In the absence of verifiable cases.
IF THERE’S NO CORONAVIRUS EPIDEMIC AT ALL: EXPERIMENT
on here. What if there is no epidemic, no new COVID disease at all,
and no legitimate testing procedure for counting the “infected“?
Let’s just make that hypothesis for a moment, and then try to
started out with a little experiment. First I called Santa Clara
County health department, 408) 992-4900 and after 30 minutes finally
got through to someone. I asked if Santa Clara County had any
facility where I could refer my patients who had the flu, where they
could be tested to rule out coronavirus.
answer was unequivocal – No – Santa Clara County has no
testing facility for
next question was, well all these numbers of coronavirus cases on
your website – where are they coming from if you have no
representative told me that people had to go to their individual
practitioners, at pulmonary clinics, etc. in order to be tested. And
then these doctors would voluntarily inform the county so they could
add the numbers to the scoreboard.
there’s Brush-off #1.
ILLUSION OF TESTING – NO REAL MARKET
next question to the County was: what kind of testing are the doctors
using at these clinics? Answer: we
where this is going, as we start down the bureaucratic rabbit hole?
my next step was to call local MDs, especially pulmonary specialists
in the Bay Area. After calling more than 50 of
these offices, the answer was a resounding No – 100% of
the time. No, we do not have any test that we can use to rule out
safe to assume that 50 is a sufficient number of clinics in the Bay
Area to determine whether there’s any clinic who offers PCR or
any other test for coronavirus. My contention is that there are no
practitioners who have such a test and therefore coronavirus
screening tests are simply not available in Santa Clara County.
therefore we have no idea how many cases there are. Or if there are
any at all.
you then ask the clinic – Do you know anyone who does have the
test – guess what they say. Take a guess.
tell you to call the Santa Clara County Dept. of Health – which
is who told you to go to the individual clinics in the first place.
See the game here?
why would all the pulmonary specialists in one of the most densely
populated sections of the country have no interest whatsoever in
screening people for a respiratory disease being hawked by all media
as the most dangerous epidemic threat we’ve ever seen…?
the respiratory MDs are not taking the outbreak very seriously –
not much faith in its virulence. Think about it – if this
epidemic were real, would all these doctors ignore
an entire market,
a perfectly valid hypothesis might be this: the County’s online
scoreboard is fraudulent. There are no proven cases at all. These
reported cases of so-called COVID are nothing more than the flu,
because there is no
available testing procedure in
all of the Bay Area that can diagnose the disease – in an area
with 5 million people.
even if there were, the standard test cited in any medical reference
for COVID is the RT-PCR test,
for which we have seen above the evidence of its inherent inaccuracy
and lack of reliability.
extrapolation then, it is fairly reasonable to say that the random
reporting we see at work in one of the richest, most populous
communities in the US is no different from what is going on
everywhere else across the nation. Looks like it’s all being
orchestrated via the same corporate narrative.
we’ve seen in the past few months may be nothing more than the
traditionally used to conjure up new Boutique Epidemics, in the
absence of any truly novel disease.  We
have to look at last year’s figures. In every community, in
very state, let’s take a look at the annual numbers of people
who got the flu, for the past 3 years. Guess what you’ll find.
No difference at all this year.
what was this all about – what was the objective from the
outset? Was it merely the $8.3
barrel for local, state and federal employees to squabble over?
media’s increasing stranglehold and censorship of oppo
information now in place, this particular Boutique Epidemic got a
little carried away and had an excessive effect on the stock market,
travel, and international trade. Which has not yet corrected.
all that will eventually normalize, as soon as the politics resolves
stop worrying about it, exercise, bu8ld up your immune system. Keep
watching for the bottom of the market, and then go about your
business. Stop listening to science fiction stories about how bad it
could get, etc. written by those who lack apposable thumbs.. Or about
how it’s the President’s fault for not doing this or
Boutique Epidemic is now in uncharted territory. Certainly not as
easily predictable as all the others have been. But it’s
getting increasingly difficult now to perpetuate the whole road show
in the hands of a hysterical bureaucracy alone, and in the absence of
any transparent, verifiable science.
National Library of Medicine Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis:
30 Years of Dissent
Front Public Health. 2014; 2: 154.
Hu, Y Regulatory Concern of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Carryover
Clara County Alerts –
Dept of Public Health – Coronavirus Disease 2019
FoxNews Live 29 Feb 2020 — News Alert press conference –
The White House
Trump signs $8.3B coronavirus spending bill – Fox 6 Mar
As the coronavirus spreads, … best-case scenario is 15 million
dead and a $2.4 trillion hit to global GDP Yahoo news 5 Mar
Kary B. Mullis: Nobel Prize –
CDC: Testing in US